Model Significance (1)
Key idea:
Variation is normal, not suspicious
Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)):
Categorical Explanatory
Quantitative Explanatory
Null Distribution: \(\frac{b_1}{s_{b1}}\sim t(df=n-2)\)
Sampling Distribution: \(\frac{b_1-\beta_1}{s_{b1}}\sim t(df=n-2)\)
\[Y_A\sim N(20, 3), \quad Y_B\sim N(20, 3), \quad n_1=n_2=10\]



\[Y_A\sim N(20, 6), \quad Y_B\sim N(20, 3), \quad n_1=n_2=10\]



\[Y_A\sim N(20, 6), \quad Y_B\sim N(20, 3), \quad n_1=10, n_2=15\]



\[Y_A\sim N(20, 3), \quad Y_B\sim \text{skewed right}, \quad n_1=10, n_2=15\]



\[Y_A\sim N(20, 3), \quad Y_B\sim \text{skewed right}, \quad n_1=100, n_2=150\]



For a binary numeriacl \(X\): \[Y=\beta_0+\beta_1 X + \varepsilon\] \[\frac{b_1-\beta_1}{s_{b_1}} \sim t(df=n-2)\]
\[Thumb=\beta_0+\beta_1 Gender_{Male} + \varepsilon\] - \(H_0: \beta_1=0\) vs. \(H_a: \beta_1\ne 0\)


Probability of getting a result this extreme (or more) if the null is true
Reject \(H_0\), at \(\alpha\) significance level, if:
otherwise,
Rejecting a true null
\[\begin{align*}\alpha &= P(\text{Rejecting } H_0|H_0) \\ \\ &=\frac{FP}{FP+TN}\end{align*}\]
Failing to reject a false null
\[\begin{align*}\beta &= P(\text{Not Rejecting } H_0|H_a) \\ \\ &=\frac{FN}{FN+TP}\end{align*}\]
CourseKata Ch. 11